Wayne Hage, harassed by the government and driven from his land, died
today June 5, 2006. He fought the good
fight for you, and for me. Photo Wayne and Helen Hage, 1999 |
Property and
Water Rights
see Bills, Laws, Acts, Lawsuits, Court Decisions and Appeals
(Klamath) Court Decision May Mean California Owes Billions In Water Rights, Daily Caller by California Water Alliance, posted to KBC 1/30/17. "...Judge Blank Horn’s decision establishes a precedent that the takings of Klamath River water from California and Oregon farmers in 2001 were physical acts, not regulatory ones, making them subject to the Fifth Amendment’s unreasonable seizure clause and encumbering the government with the responsibility to pay owners for their losses when they deprive them of their property..." Obama Issues Executive Order Allowing Him To Grab Your Land, MR Conservative, posted to KBC 5/3/14. July 20 & 21: “Rally To Learn, Rally To Win” Property rights rallies planned; Topics will include wolves and ranching during programs in Dorris, Yreka CDFG Director Chuck Bonham met with Siskiyou County Ranchers, Farmers and Gov't officials, by Corkey Small, Buffalo Broadcasting News Service 1/30/13. "The property owners of Siskiyou County will not tolerate the illegal taking of property or water by CDFG or any other agency of the government..." Supreme Court sides with private property against the federal government, HotAir, posted to KBC 12/5/12 Feds to cut property rights under Endangered Species Act! PLF blog, posted to KBC 10/27/12. Mandatory Ranch Management Plan illegal and unconstitutional, letter from Mark Baird, Scott Valley rancher and commercial pilot, 10/22/12 Historic Supreme Court ruling allows the Sacketts to fight EPA takeover of their land, Pacific Legal Foundation, posted to KBC 4/8/12. "The Court ruled in favor of Mike and Chantell Sackett, of Priest Lake, Idaho, who were told by EPA - and by the Ninth Circuit - that they could not get direct court review of EPA's claim that their two-thirds of an acre parcel is "wetlands" and that they must obey a detailed and intrusive EPA "compliance" order, or be hit with fines of up to $75,000 per day." Supremes: EPA actions 'Outrageous.' Argument comes in dispute over agency threats to Idaho family Sacketts, WND 1/9/12. "..the penalties that the federal agency could apply to the family, if officials chose, would be $75,000 per day. That would be $37,500 per day for violating the Clean Water Act, even though that hasn’t been adjudicated, and another $37,500 daily for violating the mandatory “order.” Given the four years that have passed since the dispute erupted, the total penalties at this point would be in the range somewhere above $110 million."
Western water
rights come under new attack, H&N
guest commentary by Pacific Legal Foundation,
posted to KBC 11/29/10. "Siskiyou
County rancher Tom Menne predicts that the
public trust crusade could “devastate” his
ranch’s profitability, throwing its 25 employees
out of work.
Fairgrounds overflows with water rights activists,
Siskyou Daily, posted to KBC 9/3/10. "More
than 500 people filled Winema Hall...to show support
for Protect Our Water – Scott Valley’s efforts to
combat what its membership believes to be an
unconstitutional attempt to control water in the
valley, use of which has traditionally been a
legally adjudicated right of property owners."
Wayne and Jean Hage vs US, Final Award
to Hage Estates, 8/2/10. "For
those of you who have been following the
progress of Hage v. U.S., filed Hage saga shows government at worst, Capital Press 12/3/09 Hage estate wins again, Capital Press 11/21/09
California water rights fact sheet, BLM, posted to KBC
10/16/09 (Klamath Basin land-use) task force met with resistance, H&N, posted to KBC 9/30/08 Hage vs U.S. final decision, posted 6/10/08 Eminent Domain, government stealing family farm, News with Views, posted 6/9/08 (Eminent Domain) - Important issues ahead in California’s primary by Geri Byrne, Modoc County Republican Party chair, H&N 5 28/08. "(Proposition 98 protects our farmlands and our businesses that Proposition 99 does not. Proposition 99 was put on the ballot by the municipalities that want to be able to take our land and use it for economic development. It includes a poison pill that will negate Proposition 98 if Proposition 99 gets more votes. It is important to vote yes on 98 and no on 99." California Scheming, by the Castle Coalition on imminent domain abuse, March 2008. Eminent domain abuse described by Annual Meeting speaker, California Farm Bureau AgAlert, posted to KBC 2/17/08 Stuck between Measures 37 and 49, Sandy family dumps money into claim but finds project in limbo, Clackamas County Review, posted to KBC 1/4/08. More on 37 and 49, go HERE. OREGON - No development yet for the 'property rights' poster girl; new law disturbs face of Measure 37, Oregonian, posted to KBC 12/26/07 Oregon Farm Bureau losing members over Measure 49, H&N 12/17/07
|