The cumulative direct and indirect costs of medical
liability
continues
to be a pervasive driver of medical care expenses in Oregon.
The result
is an ever increasing spiral of medical delivery costs that
is
driving
essential medical care out of the economic reach of many
Oregonians. A number of thoughtful and appropriate medical
liability
tort
reform concepts have once again been introduced during this
legislative session. Unfortunately, the Democrat Senate
leadership has
made clear
their intent to prevent any meaningful reform of Oregon’s
intolerable medical liability situation.
The direct
liability costs are represented by the inordinately high
liability
insurance premiums paid by all Oregon medical professionals.
These
premiums are a major cost of doing business in the Oregon
medical
community. Just as in any other business, the only
alternative
for the
medical community is to pass their costs on to their
customers. In
this
instance they must recover their costs by higher billings to
their
patient
customers.
The indirect
costs are even more substantial and permeate the
entire
medical care delivery trade. Unneeded tests, redundancy in
testing
and
over-cautious pathology requests are made for the sole
purpose of
attempting
to limit potential liability. For the same reason, extremely
expensive
imaging such as CAT scans and MRI’s are routinely ordered
in lieu of
much less expensive x-rays, even though the latter would
often
suffice. These extreme and often unnecessary expenses are
too
often
incurred solely to defend against potential tort actions.
Medical
liability premiums are indexed to the potential risk of
lawsuits
for each procedure performed and the number of those
procedures
performed. Physicians routinely limit their scope of
practice
by the
cost of the liability insurance menu relating to specialties
including
obstetrics, neurology, orthopedic procedures, emergencies,
acute
trauma and other critical care services. Too often those
services
simply
become unavailable because the physician cannot afford the
insurance
costs of performing only a few such procedures and because
alternative sources of the service are not available.
This is
particularly true in many rural areas of Oregon. The
state
already pays a portion of the medical liability insurance
premiums
for
certain practitioners in some rural areas to help the
communities
maintain
their practices. Funding for the continuation of that
critical
program is
uncertain in this budget environment.
The certain
result of the loss of these rural practices is that many
patients
in critical need of medical services must travel long
distances to
obtain
those services. The travel is not only burdensome and
expensive
but the
inherent delay in obtaining critical medical services may be
life
threatening.
Moreover,
unnecessary and prohibitively expensive equipment
upgrades
are too often driven by tort liability concerns. Perfectly
usable,
functional
and adequate equipment is routinely abandoned because
newer
updated medical equipment could provide marginally better
outcomes.
This reality results in accelerated depreciation of the
medical
equipment
requiring much higher charges per procedure in order to
recover
investment costs. The reality is that much of this high
priced
equipment
is not available in rural communities because the case
volume
simply cannot pay for the accelerated costs. The only
alternative
is to
discontinue the services provided through the use of the
equipment.
All
responsible medical professionals understand and accept the
essential
need to be held responsible for their errors and omissions
that
cause
economic damages to their patients. However, what is making
medical
services unaffordable in Oregon is the absence of any limit
on
court
awards for non-economic damages such as pain and suffering.
The
premiums for liability insurance against awards for tens of
thousands
of dollars in economic losses is affordable. Insurance
against
awards for
tens of millions of dollars in non-economic pain and
suffering
is not affordable.
Establishing
a fair cap on non-economic medical liability has both
significantly reduced costs and improved the availability of
medical
service in
other states. These states have experienced large net
increases in both the number and quality of physicians and
other medical professionals practicing in their states.
At the same
time Oregon has experienced increasing costs,
decreasing
quantity and quality of service and net losses in the number
of medical
professionals practicing their professions in our state. The
percentage
of those losses is uniformly higher across the rural
communities and appears to be accelerating. Specialty
services are no
longer
available in many communities at any price.
It is past
time that Oregon follow suit in passing medical liability
tort
reform. We know that a significant bipartisan majority of
legislators
in both
chambers will strongly support medical liability tort reform
legislation. We have good reason to believe that Governor
Kitzhaber
would sign
a reasonable medical liability tort reform measure. It is
past
time for
the Senate Democrat leadership to exercise some
responsibility
and allow
a vote on this critically needed legislation.
Remember, if you do not stand up for rural Oregon, no one
will.
Best regards,
Doug
|