Oregon Unemployment
Benefits
by Oregon Senator Doug Whitsett 3/24/11
The Oregon Legislature recently enacted
two laws to extend the payment of
benefits to unemployed Oregonians. This
is good news for unemployed Oregon
families. However, it may be bad news
for future job creation.
Senate Bill 637 provides for the
extension of federal unemployment
benefits by changing the method of
calculating those benefits from a two
year formula to a three year formula.
This change allows the state to take
advantage of another $214 million in
federal funds to be used to extend
unemployment benefit payments to Oregon
families from July until the end of this
year. This act also requires the state
to draw $11 million from the Oregon
Unemployment Trust Fund in order to meet
federal requirements.
Senate Bill 638 provides for the
extension of state unemployment benefits
totaling up to $30 million. This money
will be drawn from the Oregon
Unemployment Trust Fund. The bill was
enacted primarily to extend support for
about 17,500 Oregon families that have
exhausted their unemployment benefits.
Extended state payments will bridge the
gap until the extended federal payments
become available in July.
Unemployment tax rates for Oregon
employers automatically adjust to
account for the increased demand on the
Oregon Unemployment Trust Fund. Those
premiums are already at the highest
level allowable under Oregon law. Oregon
business employers are now paying more
than $250 million per year in additional
unemployment insurance taxes to pay for
the previous extensions of Oregon
benefit payments. The two recently
passed legislative acts will cause about
$35 million more to be drawn from the
already stressed Oregon Trust Fund. The
certain result is that the business
community will be required to continue
to pay the highest unemployment
insurance rates for a longer period to
replenish the fund. Every dollar paid
in unemployment insurance premiums is a
dollar that cannot be used to create new
jobs. Simply put, the repeated extension
of Oregon unemployment benefits means
less money to hire the unemployed.
These were difficult votes for me to
make because I know that neither choice
will actually address the causes of the
unemployment problem.
The current official unemployment rates
for counties that are entirely included
in our Senate District 28 are;
-
Crook County 17.6% unemployed with
more than 1,000 families already
having exhausted their unemployment
benefits,
-
Klamath County 13% unemployed with
more than 2,250 families having
exhausted their benefits,
-
Lake County 14.5% unemployed with
nearly 200 families having exhausted
their benefits.
We all know that these published
unemployment rates are grossly
understated. For instance, the Oregon
Department of Employment quotes the
state unemployment rate at 10.2%.
However, the Department also quotes the
total unemployed, plus all persons
marginally attached to the labor force,
plus total employed part-time for
economic reasons to be 19.5% of the
Oregon labor force. More simply stated,
nearly one out of every five employable
Oregonians are either unemployed or
underemployed. When we apply that
formula to Crook County we find more
than one out of every four employable
people are without a full time job.
My yes vote on both bills to extend the
unemployment benefits was certainly the
right vote for those tens of thousands
of people who cannot find work because
there are no available jobs.
On the other hand, the yes vote also
perpetuated the problem by taking money
from Oregon businesses that could
otherwise have been used for business
expansion and job growth. The annual
cost to business to pay the increased
unemployment insurance taxes is actually
about equal to the tax increases that
resulted from Measures 66 and 67.
The ability of the Oregon business
community to continue to pay these huge
tax and unemployment premium increases
is finite. At some point the escalating
costs will drive them out of business,
creating even more unemployment.
This downward spiral must be interrupted
by creating a better environment for
Oregon businesses to form and to
flourish. We have no hope of improving
the outcomes if we fail to address the
actual causes of the unemployment
problem.
The sad truth is that our Oregon
business community is being stifled,
smothered and repressed into submission
by excessive taxes, charges, regulations
and land use restrictions enacted by
local, state and federal governments.
Both new business start-ups and growth
in existing businesses have virtually
ceased. Job growth has stagnated, per
capita income has fallen nearly 10%
below the national average, and
investment capital is leaving Oregon
rather than being brought to the state.
Moreover, our State’s natural resource
and manufacturing sectors, that have
traditionally sustained our communities,
have been systematically targeted for
regulatory reduction. Government leaders
continue to perpetuate the myth that
regulation for the alleged purpose of
environmental preservation creates a
favorable environment for business to
locate in Oregon. The fact of the matter
is that decades of those failed policies
have both prevented business
in-migration and have driven existing
businesses out of the state. The certain
result is Oregon’s persistent national
leadership in unemployment, poverty,
hunger and homelessness.
In my opinion, Oregon’s economy and job
growth will not recover until we declare
Oregon “open for business” and actually
take action to make that happen. That
action must include revisions in what is
now among the highest personal income
tax, corporate excise tax, capital gains
tax and inheritance tax in the nation.
We must stop punishing those with the
temerity to attempt to invest their
capital in Oregon opportunities.
Further, that action must reverse the
burden of the growing plethora of
additional costs of doing business in
Oregon. The unconscionably long delays
in obtaining required permits as well as
the
myriad charges, fees, licenses, and
registrations make it nearly impossible
to invest venture capital in our state.
Land use and environmental regulations
must be scaled back to achieve a balance
between the environment conditions that
we need to achieve and the use of our
resources that is required to sustain
our families and communities.
In short, we must get our government out
of the way of economic growth and job
creation.
Remember, if we do not stand up for
rural Oregon, no one will.
Best regards,
Doug
|