Our Klamath Basin
Water Crisis
Upholding rural Americans' rights to grow food,
own property, and caretake our wildlife and natural resources.
County officials want answers to proposed TMDL
by Sara Hottman, Herald
and News 11/7/10
Klamath County Commissioner Cheryl Hukill said the meeting will give stakeholders — city and county officials as well as ratepayers — a chance to ask state officials direct questions about the total maximum daily load, or TMDL, requirements for the Klamath and Lost rivers.
A TMDL is an
Environmental Protection Agency-mandated limit on the amount
of pollutants a water body can sustain. The DEQ will
implement the TMDL standards for the Klamath River through
discharge permits issued to municipal wastewater
treatment plants.
Local officials say
treating water to the deg ree DEQ has pro - posed will cost
the city and county ratepayers millions to upgrade treatment
facilities.
Upper Klamath Lake has
had a TMDL in place since 2002.
Mark Willrett, city
public works director, will be at the meeting, but said he
doesn’t know what the discussion will touch on. Steve Kirk,
Klamath Basin Coordinator with DEQ, said he was attending
the meeting as a courtesy, since the public comment portion
of the TMDL process is over.
Clayton Creager, with
North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board in
California, also
will be there. Northern California TMDLs have already been
established for the portion of the Klamath River in
California.
The county National
Resource Advisory Board is made up of locals representing
agriculture and irrigators, mining and quarries, forests and
timber, nurseries and land development.
Developing the
TMDL
The DEQ has nearly
completed a TMDL for the Klamath and Lost rivers.
The agency distributed a
draft TMDL in February and took comments on it from March
until May. Kirk said almost 200 pages of responses to
comments will be released with the TMDL order in December.
“We intend to move
forward with (the TMDL),” Kirk said.
Klamath Falls and
Klamath County officials say the proposed limits for
pollutants like phosphorous are unreasonably low, and some
contend the TMDL is based on faulty science.
“The DEQ owes us an
explanation,” Hukill said. “We’re dealing with natural
phosphorous levels, but they want us to change.
“We had a work session
with the DEQ a few months ago … and we feel their science is
flawed.”
Local officials say the amount of naturally occurring phosphorous in the water is higher than the DEQ’s minimum load allotment, so wastewater facilities would have to make water cleaner than it is in nature, which would require costly treatment facility upgrades.
“We want an explanation
as to why they want South Suburban (Sanitary District) or
the city to pay $18 million to take care of TMDL,” Hukill
said. “We feel that it’s time we confront them with what
they’re trying to do. … We’re going to demand proper
science.”
Kirk said the agency
formed the TMDL based on mandates in the Clean Water Act.
And, he added, stakeholders can file an appeal challenging
the TMDL within 60 days of its issuance.
“We anticipate there’s a high likelihood some of the parties
will be doing that,” Kirk said.
|
Page Updated: Monday November 08, 2010 02:18 AM Pacific
Copyright © klamathbasincrisis.org, 2010, All Rights Reserved