CA New Water Governance Paradigm
Information
sent by Siskiyou County
Supervisor Marcia Armstrong 7/21/08
CA Water Plan Update: This is the management framework that the
California Water Plan is promoting for "governance" of watersheds
http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art24/
This new understanding of resource management ties in with
recent approaches in the policy sciences. The introduction of the
term “governance” signalled a change in thinking about the nature
of policy. The notion of government as the single
decision-making authority exerting sovereign control over its
citizens has been replaced by multi-scale, polycentric governance
approaches that recognize the contribution of a large number of
stakeholders, functioning in different institutional settings.
Governance takes into account the increasing importance of
basically non-hierarchical modes of governing, where non-state and
private corporate actors (formal organizations) participate in the
formulation and implementation of public policy. It thus
encompasses a broad range of processes related to the coordination
and steering of a wide range of actors by formal and informal
institutions (Mayntz 1998, Pahl-Wostl et al. in press). A
governance perspective places a strong emphasis on social learning
as an essential element of policy development and implementation (Folke
et al. 2005, Pahl-Wostl et al. 2007).
European Water Framework Directive (WFD), which entered into force
in 2000. The WFD introduces the following innovative elements into
European Water Policy:
*An integrated approach expanding the scope of water protection to
all waters, surface waters, and groundwater;
*The hydrological principle where water management is based on
river basins;
*The obligation to achieve a “good status” by 2015;
*A “combined approach” of emission limit values and quality
standards;
*Getting the prices right by introducing the principle of cost
recovery;
*Getting citizens involved more closely by prescribing public
participation in the development and implementation of the WFD.
http://www.harmonicop.uos.de/ [European model of socialistic
river management]
River Basin Management Planning (RBMP) is the integrated cross-sectoral
planning and management of river basins, even of those which do
not match political and administrative borders. RBMP will not only
enable us to improve the management of our international river
basins like the Elbe and the Rhine but this new concept also
integrates all the interests of organisations and people that use
and influence water. ...among others: professional and
non-professional public and private sector organisations,
environmental protection agencies, water authorities and
commissions, local and regional planning authorities, water
boards, inland water transport companies, environmental and
farmers' groups, anglers' associations, religious groups and
finally the individual citizens. Successful RBMP requires not only
the involvement of different interest groups but also the
integration of various disciplines like social and natural
sciences, economics, law and planning.
the context of the management and planning of river basins.
http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art3/
...the HarmoniCOP project revealed that, according to Patel
and Stel (2004), Tàbara et al. (2005), and Mostert et al. (2007),
social learning processes require:
*opportunities for critical mutual reflection and the awareness
and modification of assumptions and cultural frameworks that are
taken for granted;
the development of participatory, multiscale, democratic
decision-making processes;
*reflexive capabilities of individuals and societies for the
development of polycentric forms of resource assessment and
management;
*the empowerment of social movements and actors to shape
the political and economic boundary conditions that determine
their opportunities to become involved in the processes aimed at
improving the existing situation;
*the recognition of mutual interdependencies and interactions
in the existing networks of action;
*an increase in the capacity to reflect on assumptions about the
dynamics and cause-and-effect relationships in the system to be
managed and on the subjective valuation schemes; and
*the active engagement of individuals in collective decision
processes. This may include the development of new management
strategies and the introduction of new formal and informal rules.
In this way, processes of social learning can be improved by
facilitating processes toward:
*recognizing the diversity and complexity of the different types
of mental models and cultural frames that influence problem
definition and decision making;
*building a shared representation of the issues at stake.
Participatory modeling can help to achieve a common ground for
problem perception among a diverse group of actors, particularly
when the problem is largely ill-defined, although this does not
imply consensus building; and
*building trust among the main stakeholders and institutions as a
base for critical mutual and self-reflection.
...To conclude, sustainability learning entails overcoming many
of the prevalent dualisms that now inform assessment and decision
making with regard to the perception and use of social-ecological
systems. These include dualisms between the individual and the
collective, between human and natural systems, between structure
and change, between internal and external system properties, and
between human agency and natural conditions. A more hybrid,
relational, and co-evolutionary holistic understanding of
human-natural interactions is needed.
http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art5/
Natural resources management in general, and water resources
management in particular, are currently undergoing a major
paradigm shift. Management practices have largely been developed
and implemented by experts using technical means based on
designing systems that can be predicted and controlled. In recent
years, stakeholder involvement has gained increasing importance.
Collaborative governance is considered to be more appropriate
for integrated and adaptive management regimes needed to cope with
the complexity of social-ecological systems. The paper
presents a concept for social learning and collaborative
governance developed in the European project HarmoniCOP
(Harmonizing COllaborative Planning).
Collaboration
In recent years, the notion of government as the only
decision-making authority has been replaced by multiscale,
polycentric governance, which recognizes that a large number of
stakeholders in different institutional settings contribute to the
overall management of a resource. This change reflects a more
general trend in public policy away from the hierarchical model,
in which state authorities exert sovereign control over the people
and groups making up civil society (Mayntz 1998). Instead, a
basically nonhierarchical mode of governing is promoted in which
different stakeholders, e.g., government bodies, companies,
interest groups, and individuals, collaborate in the formulation
and implementation of public policy (Rhodes 1997).
There are different motives for increasing stakeholder
involvement. One argument based on democratic legitimacy
emphasizes that all those who are influenced by management
decisions should be given the opportunity to actively participate
in the decision-making process. Principles of equity and social
fairness demand that the voices of the less powerful should also
be heard (e.g., REC 1998, 1999, Renn et al. 1995; C.
Pahl-Wostl and D. Ridder, unpublished manuscript). A pragmatic
approach is to build on the insight that complex issues and
integrated management approaches cannot be tackled without taking
into account stakeholders’ information and perspectives and
without their collaboration. Interdependence between government
bodies and other stakeholders is increasing because of, for
instance, decreasing government budgets that reduce the efficacy
of the traditional command-and-control management style.
Collective decisions are needed to implement effective management
strategies, and the combination of top-down and bottom-up
formation of institutional arrangements may lead to a greater
acceptance by all the stakeholders involved.
|