Our Klamath Basin
Water Crisis
Upholding rural Americans' rights to grow food,
own property, and caretake our wildlife and natural resources.
4/11/08
(The
Natural Resource Advisory Council
was supposed to vote today to recommend to the Klamath
Commissioners how to vote on the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement.
They decided to vote in May because they need more time, and,
Draft 12 has not been made public yet.
The
comments recorded by board member Ransom covered the majority of
the concerns expressed by most of the board, with all the board
members expressing that they believe that their are viable
solutions to these concerns and that they would like to see the
parties work out the differences that still exist.)
4/11/08 We were told that Advisory Council member Bill Ransom's comments to the Council yesterday regarding the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement went something like this: After spending a good deal of my time today on the phone with calls concerning how I would vote tonight, I am reminded that as we vote here, we are not just voting for those who participated in the agreement talks, but that we are representing the 65,000 plus people that live in Klamath County. What we do here also effects thousands that live below this upper basin.
With that in mind, I cannot vote to spend millions of tax
payers dollars to purchase land that could be taken off of
county tax rolls, during a time when we are trying to stretch
dollars just to keep up with education and administration costs.
I cannot vote to remove dams when it hasn't been proven that
it will restore salmon runs, or that is even the major cause of
the decline of the salmon runs. It has even been indicated that
dam removal will cause more damage than it will do good.
And finally I cannot vote for an agreement that does not
include all the farmers and rancher that live and work in this
upper basin.
|
Page Updated: Thursday May 07, 2009 09:15 AM Pacific
Copyright © klamathbasincrisis.org, 2008, All Rights Reserved