Our Klamath Basin
Water Crisis
Upholding rural Americans' rights to grow food,
own property, and caretake our wildlife and natural resources.
Dam removal, tree
farm biggest part of dispute
Herald and News letter to the editor
11/7/10 by Jerry Pappe, Sprague River
I do believe that
the closeness of the margin on Ballot Measure 18-80 is
because of the deceptive way it was written.
As I previously
wrote, a “yes” meant “no,” and a “no” meant “yes.” If
that isn’t deceptive, I sure don’t know what else to
call it.
Becky Hyde, a
Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement proponent, and the
commissioners rejected the claim that it was written
that way to sway votes. Wrong.
Commissioner Al
Switzer commented in Wednesday’s paper that, “There’s no
doubt this is very
divisive in our community, and we need to bring the
community back together, but I don’t know how.” Mr.
Commissioner, take dam removal and the Mazama Tree Farm
out of the KBRA proposal and you have removed 75 percent
of the conflict.
It’s not rocket science.
Jerry Pappe
Sprague River
|
Page Updated: Thursday November 11, 2010 01:15 AM Pacific
Copyright © klamathbasincrisis.org, 2010, All Rights Reserved