Our Klamath Basin
Water Crisis
Upholding rural Americans' rights to grow food,
own property, and caretake our wildlife and natural resources.
Cards already shuffled secretly for
agreement
The judges’
interpretations of the Endangered Species Act caused the
2001 water crisis and it’s claimed the KBRA takes control
from those judges. That would be great, but we must look at
whom the KBRA gives control to.
Currently, the water is
controlled by the government, tribes and radical
environmentalists. Under the KBRA, water is controlled by
the “Klamath Basin Coordinating Council,” composed of: five
government agencies, three tribes, two environmentalist groups
— already, 10 out of 18 members who support the 2001 and
2010 water shortages.
Farmers have three
votes; Klamath, Siskiyou, Del Norte, Humboldt, one vote
each; fishermen, one vote.
That’s basically
continuation of the status quo that hurt farmers in the
first place. Those groups may give us a “seat at the table,”
but the poker cards have already been secretly shuffled to
benefit those already in control.
It’s naive to replace
judges with the plaintiff’s suing farmers and expect a
different result.
It’s especially true
since the KBRA can be interpreted different ways. Craig
Tucker, the Karuk Tribe’s negotiator for the KBRA, defended
the KBRA, saying that there are no guarantees of water for
farms in the agreement, only a cap on how much can be
diverted.
“What’s capped in this agreement is agricultural water use,”
Tucker said. (The Times-Standard July 15, 2010)
Under
the KBRA, we lose four fully functional hydropower dams
which provide enough electricity for 70,000 homes and some
downriver flood protection.
Sadly,
after dam removal, Shasta Valley farmers lose 60,000
acre-feet of senior water rights storage they have sought to
develop.
It’s
obvious why U.S. Rep Tom McClintock (Modoc County) calls it
all “absolute insanity.”
|
Page Updated: Monday October 11, 2010 01:18 AM Pacific
Copyright © klamathbasincrisis.org, 2010, All Rights Reserved