Our Klamath Basin
Water Crisis
Upholding rural Americans' rights to grow food,
own property, and caretake our wildlife and natural resources.
Water issues dominate Merkley town hall
Senator speaks at high
school Tuesday in Merrill
by
SAMANTHA TIPLER, Herald and News 4/5/12
H&N photo by Samantha Tipler
U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley,
D-Ore., speaks at a town
hall meeting at Lost River High School in Merrill Tuesday
Merkley told the crowd
of 80 people he at first didn’t think the Klamath Basin
could reach a resolution of any kind when it came to water.
“I thought ‘this will never happen. There will never be an agreement worked out.’ It is so hard. It’s like Middle East peace,” he said.
He was surprised to see
an agreement reached, he said.
“The Klamath Basin
Restoration Agreement remains controversial,” he said, “but
the fact is that stakeholders were sitting in a room,
working together, and got to know each other.”
In November, Merkley
introduced legislation to move aspects of the KBRA forward,
including removing dams. This year, Merkley is pursuing
hearings on the legislation, but has said in the meantime he
plans to push portions of the agreement that don’t require
legislation, such as finding funding in the
federal budget.
Tuesday Merkley heralded
additional work coming out of consensus built through the
KBRA. That consensus, Merkley asserted, helped the Basin
survive the 2010 drought. Cooperation between stakeholders,
the Klamath Tribes, fisherman and farmers — along with $10
million in federal assistance — helped the area make it
through the crisis, Merkley said.
“Most folks in Oregon
don’t know the Klamath Basin had a drought two years ago,”
he said.
Locals react
Merkley’s confidence in
the agreement didn’t stop locals from calling him out on it.
“You’re on the wrong
side of the KBRA,” said Bill Adams, Klamath Falls City
Council member. “It does not guarantee
Mike King, a Klamath Falls farmer, said the majority of farmers were against the KBRA. He referenced a public hearing where he said 70 percent of the testimony was against the agreement.
“This is a no-win
situation for everybody,” he said.
Merkley said a water
agreement needs support from those living in the Basin.
“ Nothing can get
through Congress that ultimately doesn’t have
substantial support by
the people,” he said.
Merkley agreed with
another problem raised by Mathew Trotman, of Merrill, who
asked about the
effect of biological opinions on the ability of farmers to
do their jobs.
“You have two
conflicting biological opinions,” Merkley said. “One for
fish in the lake and one for fish in the stream. So we’re
trying to figure out how to basically harmonize those two
pieces of the puzzle.”
He said the National
Marine Fisheries Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife are
working on that problem, but it is difficult.
Merkley was not
surprised when water came up again and again as a topic.
Even with the agreement, and with continued work with
endangered species, he said the matter is far from settled.
“I think this is a
debate that is going to continue,” he said.
==================================================== In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml |
Page Updated: Saturday April 07, 2012 01:59 AM Pacific
Copyright © klamathbasincrisis.org, 2001 - 2012, All Rights Reserved