Our Klamath Basin
Water Crisis
Upholding rural Americans' rights to grow food,
own property, and caretake our wildlife and natural resources.
Report: Dam removal would create jobs
Secretary of the
Interior talks about highlights of study to be released
Thursday
By SARA HOTTMAN, Herald
and News 9/20/11
The report also found
the actual cost of dam removal would be $290 million,
Salazar said,
Salazar’s comments came
from prepared
remarks he was scheduled to read Monday morning at the
Commonwealth Club in San Francisco.
On
Thursday, the U.S. Department of Interior will release
the full report, a draft environmental impact study
conducted by federal agencies and private consultants
tasked with informing Salazar’s determination on whether
the Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement, which
calls for dam removal, is in the public’s interest. A
public comment period will follow.
If the
agreement, which has faced vocal opposition locally,
is implemented, starting in January 2020 Pacifi-Corp
will remove four of its dams on the Klamath River at
the Oregon-California border, launching a number of
riparian habitat restoration projects.
Salazar praised the
Whitsett said he would reserve specific comments
until he read the full draft environmental
impact study, but said, “Dams and sediment
can’t be
removed for $290 million.”
He was particularly
concerned about sedimentation build-up behind dams that
could cause environmental problems once it’s released
downstream. He also wants to see how researchers address
high power rates and reliable water supply.
The KBRA aims to
establish sustainable water supplies and affordable power
rates for irrigators, restore fish habitats, and help the
Klamath Tribes acquire a 92,000-acre parcel of private
timberland known as the Mazama Tree Farm.
Gary Wright, president
of the Klamath Water Users Association board of directors,
doesn’t think the findings of the environmental studies
would curb opposition to the agreements.
“The issues are deeper,”
he said. “It involves (water rights) adjudication, so I’d
say they’re pretty set in their ways as far as opposition
goes.”
Study: Dam removal could create thousands of jobs
Economic impact studies
show removing four dams on the Klamath River could create
thousands of jobs in the agriculture, environmental and
fishing industries in Oregon and California, said Secretary
of the Interior Ken Salazar.
Removing dams would
eliminate 50 jobs, Salazar noted, and would reduce
hydroelectric power generation, as well as diminish
recreational activities in the area. It would also reduce
property values for nearby landowners.
But reliable water
supplies could allow the Basin agricultural industry to add
between 70 and 695 jobs annually and would boost gross farm
income, he said.
Improved fish habitat
from removing dams would result in an improved fishing
economy — hundreds of jobs in each coastal county in Oregon
and California, Salazar said — and programs to restore
habitats could add 4,600 jobs to the Basin over 15 years,
including 1,400 in 2020, the year of dam removal.
U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley,
D-Ore., lauded the water agreement in a statement released
Monday.
“Members of the Klamath
Basin community have worked for years to forge an agreement
that will help end disputes over water and provide a
sustainable and stable foundation for future planning,” he
said. “This has been no easy task, but (Salazar) today
shared a preview of why this agreement is so important: it
will help the economy in the Basin grow.”
Merkley’s office is
writing implementation legislation for the Klamath Basin
Restoration Agreement. U.S. Rep. Greg Walden, R-Klamath
Falls, who has not offered support for the agreements, was
traveling Monday and was unavailable for comment.
Side Bar
|
Page Updated: Wednesday September 21, 2011 02:42 AM Pacific
Copyright © klamathbasincrisis.org, 2001 - 2011, All Rights Reserved