Klamath farmers take heed of Metropolitan
February 11, 2010 by BRUCE COLBERT for the
Capital Press
By making benefits to water users contingent
on high water allocations, the 2010 Klamath Basin Restoration
Agreement is similar to the 1994 Interim Agricultural Water
Program by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern
California. Klamath Basin landowners ought to avoid repeating
the process that is presently devastating Southern California
farmers.
The IAWP was established in 1994 to provide
delivery of "surplus water" for agricultural purposes at a
discounted rate. In exchange, participating agricultural water
users agreed to an initial 30 percent reduction in deliveries
during shortage periods and to larger reductions during greater
shortages.
In November 2007, Metropolitan for the first time
mandated that IAWP participants reduce their water use. The
action impacted local farming communities, where growers cut
their crops 30 percent. Avocado and citrus growers have stumped
or removed trees. These water cutbacks continue to harm
agriculture.
The reductions were caused by the ongoing drought
and the regulatory restrictions on pumping from the
Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. These ongoing restrictions
have fundamentally changed the availability of surplus water
supplies for Metropolitan, with surplus supplies reduced for the
foreseeable future.
As a result, Metropolitan voted to completely
phase out the IAWP in 2008 over a five-year period. The IAWP
water discount will be gradually reduced during the phase-out
period. The cost of untreated IAWP water will increase by $90
per acre-foot and the cost of treated water will increase by
$114 per acre-foot. By the end of the phase-out period, the
water costs and the water allocation requirements for
agricultural and urban customers will be the same. As of 2013,
the IAWP will no longer exist.
By comparison, the Klamath agreement provides
assurances that landowners will have full access to water in
high-water years. In exchange, landowners cede irrigation water
for conservation purposes in low-water years.
The KBRA calls for the acquisition of 30,000
acre-feet of water in the upper basin. Reintroduction of salmon
above Iron Gate Dam could have potential regulatory or other
legal consequences for users of water and land upstream of the
current site of Iron Gate Dam under various statutory and common
laws. This reintroduction of salmon could result in new or
modified regulatory obligations that could affect the ability to
divert or use or dispose of water, or the ability to utilize
land productively.
Tribes reserve their rights to sue for more water
under statutes of general applicability, including the
Endangered Species Act. Furthermore, KBRA prohibits Klamath
Project Water Users from contesting the potentially massive
tribal instream claims. In other words, the KBRA provides the
conditions for future water cutbacks.
Litigious environmental organizations, whose
goals are to stop growth and commerce and to get farmers off the
land, use conditions for future water cutbacks, such as those
provided in the KBRA, to achieve their goals and put farmers out
of business. These organizations share the experience they gain
on the Klamath Basin with like-minded organizations at the state
level on the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. Hence, the
manmade drought and California's water crisis.
If Klamath Basin landowners want to avoid further
devastation of their farming livelihoods, landowners would do
well to take to heart what is already happening to farmers who
ceded their rights during low water allocations. Examine the
KBRA conditions for future water cutbacks and the potential for
low water allocations.
Trust in "We the people," rather than
indifferent, unaccountable bureaucrats and lobbyists, and stand
strong for landowners' rights. Edmund Burke stated, "The only
thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing." To paraphrase Winston Churchill: Appeasing government
is like feeding a crocodile, hoping it will eat you last.
Landowners must hold public officials accountable
to avoid the loss of their rights, freedom and livelihoods.
Bruce Colbert is executive director of the
Property Owners Association of Riverside County, Calif.
The association is a nonprofit, public policy
research, lobbying and educational organization formed in 1983
to protect the interests and private property rights of
landowners.