Our Klamath Basin
Water Crisis
Upholding rural Americans' rights to grow food,
own property, and caretake our wildlife and natural resources.
Water talks almost done
Meetings are
planned in Klamath Falls
< Kirk Miller, California Resources Agency deputy secretary, is optimistic that a final agreement on studying dam removal will be done in coming weeks.Kirk Miller, deputy secretary and general counsel for the California Resources Agency, and Pablo Arroyave, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation’s assistant regional director, said those involved in the discussions, including PacifiCorp, would meet in Klamath Falls next week. The final agreement will be based on an agreement in principle announced last November.
“I
think the parties at the table will reach a dam removal
agreement,” Miller said. “We do anticipate concluding the final
agreement shortly.”
Representatives from the 26-plus agencies involved in hammering
out a final agreement — including state and federal government
agencies, environmental groups, American Indian tribes, water
users, fishermen and county governments — have met numerous
times over the past few years on the Klamath Basin Restoration
Agreement. The restoration agreement charts a plan for providing water
for various interests. A key condition of that agreement is
removal of four Klamath River dams.
The group initially set a deadline goal of June 30, but extended the deadline to Aug. 31.
“Just giving everybody time
to speak is a time consuming process,” Miller said. “It’s the
nature of working with a complex issue with a large number of
parties.”
Miller said discussions have
included concerns voiced by Siskiyou County supervisors, who
have repeatedly voiced opposition
to dam removals. “I believe
the format we’re
negotiating is directly related to the concerns Siskiyou County
has made,” Miller said, noting state officials believe
scientific studies must be made prior to removing any dams.
Miller
said California’s share of funding dams removal likely will be
part of a proposed water bond that would fund a range of water
issues, including the Klamath River, Sacramento Delta and other
areas. The state Legislature would determine when a bond issue
goes to the voters.
In
Oregon, Gov. Ted Kulongoski signed a bill to allow PacifiCorp to
charge ratepayers to pay for dam removal. Estimated cost to
residential customers would be about $1.50 a month.
Side Bars
A
framework
A
final agreement on a plan to remove four Klamath hydropower dams
— Iron Gate, Copco 1, Copco 2 and J.C. Boyle — is not
necessarily a commitment to remove the dams.
Instead, it
provides a framework for the various interest groups and
government agencies to collaborate on environmental and economic
studies. The plan, as it stands, would conduct studies until
2012, when the Secretary of the Interior would make a final
decision on whether the dams should be removed.
Dam,
water agreement are connected
A plan to study the removal of four Klamath River dams will
provide momentum in completing the Klamath Basin Restoration
Agreement, a more comprehensive plan aimed at resolving concerns
for government agencies, tribes, water users and fisheries along
the Upper and Lower Klamath River basins.
“It goes hand-in-hand with the KBRA. It’s really a package,”
said Pablo Arroyave, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation’s assistant
regional director in Sacramento. “These agreements have the
potential to change people’s lives in a positive way. They’re
both really critical to solving the Klamath Basin crisis.”
“It is true the two agreements work together,” said Kirk Miller, California Resources Agency deputy secretary. “We would hope to conclude the KBRA shortly after concluding the dam agreement.” |
Page Updated: Monday August 03, 2009 02:47 AM Pacific
Copyright © klamathbasincrisis.org, 2009, All Rights Reserved