Our Klamath Basin
Water Crisis
Upholding rural Americans' rights to grow food,
own property, and caretake our wildlife and natural resources.
FERC Agrees with LaMalfa: KRRC Can’t
Handle Klamath Dams’ License
LaMalfa Suggests Relicensing Would Be Cost-effective and
Provide Reliable Energy
Yreka News Facebook Page 7/17/2020
Rep. Doug LaMalfa
issued the following statement after the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC) announced that the Klamath
River Renewal Corporation (KRRC) lacked the finances and
experience to be the sole licensees of the four dams on
the Klamath River. At PacifiCorp’s discretion KRRC may
be a co-licensee, but PacificCorp would retain liability
for the hydropower dams on the Klamath River. PacifiCorp
previously announced they would seek to transfer the
license to operate these dams to the Klamath River
Renewal Corporation, who would assume all liability and
then oversee their removal. FERC’s July 16th Order
states KRRC is “not equipped to handle” this project,
and “has limited finances and no experience with
hydropower dam operation or dam removal.”
“The
Commission’s Order today reinforces what I have been
saying since KRRC’s inception: KRRC is incapable of
handling any hydropower project. Rather, KRRC is nothing
more than a shell corporation created for California,
Oregon, and other supporters of dam removal to avoid
liability and leave local communities to clean up the
mess they would create. I am happy to see that FERC
agreed with the many issues I, and other stakeholders,
brought to their attention," stated LaMalfa. "It would
have set a dangerous precedent to give a shell
cooperation sole liability for the immense damage to the
environment and local economy that this project would
create. Smaller dam removal projects have faced
significantly higher costs than originally estimated and
this project has made the same failed assumptions. This
Order clears the way to stop this terrible project
without wasting more of California taxpayer funds or
Oregon ratepayer dollars. PacifiCorp should instead
pursue relicensing of all four Klamath dams, ensuring
the Basin continues to receive ample carbon free, clean
power for years to come.”
COMMENTS:
Dam removal would result in a muddy trickle of water
by fall every year. The dams are controlling water
release and preventing a major fish kill plus many
other benefits for all of us. NO to dam removal!
Very happy with this decision. Even though they have
been adding money our Power bill for years we are
not happy with the proposal to pull the dams
After watching them pull water out to put on the
Klamathon Fire...definitely NO!! removal!
I really don’t know much about this but I do know
that one bubble sent up through a pipe at depth can
move a lot of water that will turn a power turbine
creating power. It’s called overunity.
LaMouthfull... has many words.
==================================================== In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml |
Page Updated: Saturday July 18, 2020 08:05 PM Pacific
Copyright © klamathbasincrisis.org, 2001 - 2019, All Rights Reserved