Time to Take Action
Our Klamath Basin Water Crisis
Upholding rural Americans' rights to grow food,
own property, and caretake our wildlife and natural resources.
 

http://www.heraldandnews.com/members/forum/letters/keep-false-hope-out-of-dam-issue/article_a559b6c6-658e-5bac-b67c-8f8ba289f6cb.html

Keep false hope out of the dam issue

Herald and News letter to the editor by Don Maushardt, Klamath Falls 10/9/15

The article about Dennis Lynch and dam removal stated that “Blasting four dams out of the Klamath River will improve water quality and better regulate stream temperatures, according to water experts.” Mr. Lynch went on to say that he probably knows more about Upper Klamath Lake than anyone else. This is very misleading and creates the impression that all we have to do is remove the dams and everything will be okay.
 
At present, Klamath Lake can reach temperatures at the surface in excess of 80 F during the summer months. Allowing a direct flow of Klamath Lake water directly downstream, will in most cases, can result in extreme stress to the existing fishery and to the salmon.
 
Additionally, I would question the technical validity of how the dam removal would improve water quality in the Klamath River. While I am not opposed to the removal of the dams, it is important for governmental officials to provide what will be the required “remediation” issues and “water management changes” needed to fully restore the fishery to the Klamath River.
 
During this drought we are faced with many hard decisions, and the creation of false hope or misleading statements is detrimental to achieving a plausible solution to water issues in the Klamath Basin.

=================================================

http://www.heraldandnews.com/klamath/dam-removal-expert-do-it-in-one-year/article_939b3ead-ca1a-55b4-8508-9f02ec3e0b23.html

Dam removal expert: Do it in one year. Sediment is best washed out in winter
by Lacey Jarrell, Herald and News 10/6/15

Blasting four dams out of the Klamath River will improve water quality and better regulate stream temperatures, according to water experts.
 
At a three-day 2015 Oregon Lake Association Conference held last weekend, Dennis Lynch, associate regional director of the U.S. Geological Survey, said estimated costs for removing the four dams is just shy of $300 million in 2020 dollars.
 
Lynch, who has studied Upper Klamath Lake and the Klamath watershed for more than 20 years, provided opening remarks and a primer on the Klamath water settlements Saturday morning. The conference was held at the Klamath Yacht Club.

 
“I probably have the rare distinction of being the person who has spent more time under Upper Klamath Lake than anybody else on the planet,” Lynch said.
 
He also oversaw preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement and dozens of Klamath River federal studies related to developing a plan for dam removal, according to conference documents. Lynch’s work included determining the potential effects dam removal could have on the environment and local communities.
 
Lynch said a cycle of Basin-wide water-related “rotating crises” are what triggered the creation of a suite of agreements cemented in the Klamath Water Recovery and Economic Restoration Act, Senate Bill 133.
 
The bill encompasses the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement (KBRA) and the Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement and the Upper Klamath Basin Comprehensive Agreement. The comprehensive bill aims to create a host of benefits for Basin stakeholders, including reintroducing salmon to the Basin’s upper reaches and improving riparian habitat by removing four dams — the J.C. Boyle, Iron Gate, Copco 1 and Copco 2 — from the Klamath River.
 
The four dams are owned and operated by PacifiCorp, the parent company of Pacific Power.
 
He noted that two endangered sucker species — Lost River and shortnose — inhabit Upper Klamath Lake and endangered coho salmon inhabit the Klamath River. The dams do not provide fish passage and more than 300 miles of spawning habitat has been cut off from salmon species since the early 20th century.
 
Scientists concluded about 13 million cubic yards of material is lodged behind the four dams, almost all of it fine grain, according to Lynch.
 
Lynch said instead of dragging the demolition on for three or four years and having blasts of sediment flowing downstream each year, scientists want to take all four dams down in a single year, so the pulses of sediment behind the dams only affect one cohort of fish.
 
“About half of it would likely transport downstream during the drawdown process. Because it’s so fine grain, almost all of it would end up in the ocean in the first year,” he said.
 
Scientists designed the water drawdown and dam removal to occur in winter to protect coho, which peak in the river system in late-September and early October.
 
Lynch said short-term impacts to coho will be minimal. Less than 10 percent mortality is expected for coho and fall and spring chinook, according to Lynch.

====================================================

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 

 

====================================================

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Home Contact

 

              Page Updated: Friday October 16, 2015 12:32 AM  Pacific


             Copyright © klamathbasincrisis.org, 2001 - 2015, All Rights Reserved