E-Update on
Federal Land Management: Fighting for Access to YOUR
Federal Lands
Unfortunately, our federal land
management agencies under the Obama Administration have
continued an alarming trend of restricting access and
multiple use of our federal lands. As a strong proponent
of federal policies that give the American people full
access to our public lands, I am very concerned by this
trend. Through my involvement with the House Western
Caucus and other pro-multiple use groups, I am doing
everything I can to oppose these restrictive federal land
management policies.
Most recently, in response to the
overwhelming comments that I have received in opposition
to the Forest Service’s move to
ban OHVs from gravel roads on national forest land, I
sent a
letter to Under Secretary Harris Sherman requesting
that he overturn this policy in order to ensure
consistency and balance with OHV-use. I had previously
written the Forest Service on this issue but the agency
has yet to heed the public’s desire for a more practical
OHV policy. I strongly believe that the Forest Service’s
position on this issue unjustifiably prohibits a
reasonable and popular use of our federal lands, and I
will continue to do all I can to oppose and overturn this
damaging rule.
Second, in response to a disturbing
letter from 72 members of the House of Representatives
supporting the creation of over 3 million acres of new de
facto wilderness areas, I joined several of my colleagues
in sending a response
letter to the Forest Service opposing this effort and
reminding the agency that they do not have authority under
the law to designate new wilderness or de facto wilderness
areas – only Congress has the authority to do so. While I
have long been opposed to wilderness designations under
any circumstances, I also believe that the decision to do
so is best left to a vote before Congress instead of a
backdoor process by which federal land agencies act to
restrict use of an area as if it had been designated by
Congress. We must stand up for our land use rights
against this effort to further increase Federal
regulation. As such, I will continue to closely monitor
this issue and will pursue whatever means possible to
prevent these or any other restrictive, bureaucratic
land-use decrees.
Share your thoughts |