Our Klamath Basin
Water Crisis
Upholding rural Americans' rights to grow food,
own property, and caretake our wildlife and natural resources.
Response by Dan Keppen, Klamath
Water Users to Herald and News letter by ONRC Jim
McCarthy, Ashland regarding our refuges. 5/5/04
His comments about not sharing are ridiculous.
Last year, nearly 15,000 acres of farmland were
idled, over 50,000 acre-feet of water provided to
the water bank via groundwater and idling, and
another 30,000 acre-feet of groundwater were
pumped outside of the water bank - with no
compensation - to help USBR meet lake level
requirements.
McCarthy clearly doesn't understand that, when the
Project tightens things up from a water use
standpoint, the refuges receive less water. He
fails to see the true problem we face: the largest
"new" demand in the Klamath River basin are the
flow targets established in the NOAA Fisheries BO,
which is the driving force behind the uncertain
water supplies faced by both the Project and the
Lower Klamath refuge system. As a result, the
federal government has resorted to pumping
California and Oregon groundwater to meet a water
bank schedule that escalates each year, with no
consideration for actual hydrologic conditions.
And on and on.
Dan Keppen |
Home
Page Updated: Thursday May 07, 2009 09:14 AM Pacific
Copyright © klamathbasincrisis.org, 2004, All Rights Reserved