A federal judge in Oregon has ruled that the
federal government erred in placing Klamath
River coho salmon on the threatened and
endangered species list, but let stand federal
protections until the government completes a
review this spring.
The ruling
issued Monday by U.S. District Judge Michael
Hogan extends the same legal logic that he used
in 2001 to strike down protection for Oregon
coastal coho over the lack of genetic
distinction between hatchery and wild salmon.
In this case, however, his ruling focuses on the
Klamath River's coho salmon, which have long
been at the center of a struggle over water
between fishermen and farmers. That struggle was
triggered by a multiyear drought and water
levels so low that fields were fallowed, farmers
bankrupted and thousands of fish died.
Russell Brooks, an attorney for irrigators and
farmers in Oregon and California, said the
ruling gives his clients a quick legal avenue to
halt any new attempt by federal officials to
curtail water to farmers, as was done in 2001,
to protect the rare and endangered coho salmon.
"We are approaching another growing season, and
if the government were to step in and say, 'We
cannot deliver as much water as you want,' we
will be back in court with an injunction," said
Brooks, of the Pacific Legal Foundation.
"In that way,
the judge tied the government's hands," Brooks
said.
But Glen Spain, a fishing industry
representative, said it was an empty victory for
farmers and irrigators because the judge refused
to strip coho salmon of federal protections.
"The real issue
is a water grab by a few disgruntled irrigators
and the judge saw that," said Spain, a regional
director of the Pacific Coast Federation of
Fishermen's Assns.
Spain said salmon fishermen can also show damage
from lack of water, and that a die-off of mostly
chinook salmon in the Klamath in 2002 may result
in widespread fishing closures in coming months.
"What kills chinook, also kills coho salmon," he
said. "We can show real damage in the river from
lack of water. Sixty thousand dead fish don't
tell lies."
Brian Gorman, a
spokesman for the National Marine Fisheries
Service, predicted that Hogan's decision in this
case will be rendered moot by the agency's newly
proposed hatchery policy and review of
endangered species protections of the Klamath
coho.
The fisheries service, by June 14, must complete
its proposal to again list the Klamath coho as
threatened with extinction under a new hatchery
policy that was prompted by Hogan's first
decision in 2001.
In reaction to
that ruling, the fisheries service will count
hatchery-raised fish along with the rare wild
ones as threatened or endangered.
"The eventual outcome for all of this won't make
any difference to the fish," Gorman said.
"They will
remain protected. But it will change things for
people, in that the rules will be a bit more
complicated."
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section
107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit
or payment to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this
information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For
more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml