Farm Aid Fraud
By Trent Loosposted to KBC 4/18/04, from
discussion forum
During a speech in Michigan I pointed out that
groups like Farm Aid and Willie Nelson are doing
more to get rid of farmers than to benefit them.
Farm Aid funds are siphoned into groups that are
filing lawsuits against family farms. Nearly a dozen
lawsuits have been filed against families in Iowa.
In Minnesota, I personally know three families with
lawsuits against them for operating a livestock
facility or hoping to build one.
As I continue to do more research into Farm Aid, I
am amazed at the extent of the ties between Farm Aid
and the movement that wants to completely rid animal
agriculture from the U.S.
Farm Aid has acquired millions of dollars because
the term "family farm" has tremendous sentimental
value with the American public. Consumers have been
willing to financially contribute to this cause.
This is a HUGE problem because it appears the goal
of Farm Aid is return food production to the 1920s.
If you log onto their website (www.FarmAid.org), the
home page tells you where they stand. A big red sign
urges you to purchase a shirt that says "Stop
Factory Farms." "The Meatrix," possibly the single
most damaging piece of recent work against
agriculture, is featured. There is a campaign called
"Say NO to irradiated meat". They urge you to "tell
USDA we don't need genetically engineered crops."
Farm Aid's website includes photos and statements
from Farm Sanctuary, a group that promotes a vegan
and vegetarian lifestyle. Farm Sanctuary put the
only two swine farmers in Florida out of business by
promoting a law that bans individual animal housing
units for sows. They are currently supporting
legislation in New Jersey and California to put more
family farms out of business.
Farm Aid funds support Concerned Citizens of Iowa (CCI)
who brag on their website "At the local level, CCI
helped pass factory farm moratoriums in four
counties and passed ordinances in four other
counties."
Farm Aid funds go to Illinois for the Illinois
Stewardship Alliance. Their purpose is to: Establish
and enforce regulations necessary to protect the
health and well-being of rural communities from the
negative results of livestock production facilities.
Educate the public as to the undesirable
consequences of livestock production facilities on
rural economic, environmental and social systems.
The Campaign for Family Farms, a group that talks
about family farmers but doesn't really know any,
spearheaded litigation against the Pork Checkoff.
They teamed up with the Western Organization of
Resource Councils, a group that led the charge
against the Beef Checkoff.
There are many more groups that benefit from Farm
Aid funds and use them against family farms: The
Dakota Resource Council, Northern Plains Resource
Council, and the Western Organization of Resource
Councils (WORC) filed a petition March 11 with the
U. S. Department of Agriculture for a full
Environmental Impact Statement to "address the
economic, social, and environmental consequences of
introducing genetically-modified (GM) wheat."
Let's not forget The National Family Farm Coalition
who "has been one of the leading farmer advocacy
voices that has raised concerns about the potential
effects this new technology (GMO's) will have on
farmers."
To top it off, Country Music Television (CMT)
recently ran a Farm Aid documentary. Listed in the
credits was none other than "Voice for Animals," an
animal rights group who's main goal is animal
liberation.
The more research I do on this subject, the worse it
gets. We in agriculture have allowed the opposition
to define a "factory farm" in comparison to their
idealistic "family farm."
"Factory farms" do not exist. We spend countless
hours trying to educate the public about what really
happens in food production. Meanwhile, the
opposition has stolen our best marketing tool by
designing their own image of a "family farm" and
using it against us. They are convincing the
American public that we need to roll back the clock
on food production, let our pigs roll in the dirt
and leave our combines in the shed.
What they don't seem to realize is that fewer
farmers are feeding millions more people today than
we did in 1920 and it is predicted that we will have
even more mouths to feed in the very near future.
How is foregoing technology going to help us achieve
an end to world hunger?
If farmers need to return to the "American Gothic"
way of life, then shouldn't everyone else get to
join us? Throw out your computers, color
televisions, DVDs and cell phones.
Willie, you should forget about selling CDs that
rack in millions of dollars for your Valentine Road
Corporation. You need to be selling LPs again like
you did in the "good old days." And for the record
Mr. Nelson, I have always liked your songs.
Editor's note: Trent Loos is a sixth generation
farmer who wants to bridge the gap from agriculture
producers and consumers. In addition to this column,
he can be heard daily on his radio program by the
same name. Trent can be reached via his website at
www.loostales.com
or e-mail at trent@loostales.com.
|