comments can be made on local dams klamath danny hull 060516

I approve and vote for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission conclusively rejecting — per Docket Number P-2082-027 — both destroying all Klamath River hydroelectric dams, and destroying each dam of any Klamath River hydroelectric dam(s).

Comments concerning 30-year or 50-year re-licensing for the Klamath River hydroelectric dams, possibly per U.S.A. Constitution Amendment 1, may be received of FERC per: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, or https://ferconline.ferc.gov/QuickComment.aspx ref. Docket# P-2082-027 or P-2082-000, or http://www.ferc.gov/contact-us/contact-us.asp, or Public Inquiries 1-866-208-3372, or Regional Fairness Boards 1-888-734-3247, or nonofficially per customer@ferc.gov.

Four primary complaints against the dams are:

1) No fish passageways around Copco 1, Copco 2, and Iron Gate dams;

2) the same toxic algal varieties (anabaena and microcysti! s) that are only minorily present in Upper Klamath Lake, being present in greater total algae population minorily-only percentages in the hydroelectric dam reservoirs;

3) seasonally warm dam reservoir surface water;

I also approve and vote for the United States of America Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation to both purchase the four (i.e.: J.C. Boyle, Copco 1, Copco 2, Iron Gate) Klamath River hydroelectric dams, and maintain, manage, and where necessary improve (e.g., in some of those dams install fish passageway facilities) those dams for multiuse of the Klamath River. That includes — though is not limited to — anadromous fish migration, Klamath Basin and California agriculture irrigation, subsistence, sport, and commercial fishing, Tulelake and Lower Klamath Lake Wildlife Refuge water supply, wildlife habitat, multisource clean renewable hydroelectric power generation, recreation, Klamath River mouth sandbar displacement per river flow regulation (dredging can help also), and fire suppression.

Danny L. Hull

Klamath Falls