Our Klamath Basin
Water Crisis
Upholding rural Americans' rights to grow food,
own property, and caretake our wildlife and natural resources.
Letter to the editor of KBC from
Andrew in Scotland, followed by KBC response:
Hello,
My name is Andrew and
I live in Scotland. My attention has been drawn to
your Fight against destruction of your native
fishing grounds-through the news-in the Klamath
river by Pacificorp who are a subsiduary of
Scottish power. As you are maybe aware many of the
Scottish people have a great sympathy with your
fight as similar things have happened in Scotland
where we have had native traditions, cultures and
clans who were effectively destroyed by the
British in the early century's in their pursuit of
colonisation of the world in the years gone by and
the harbouring of our natural resources such as
rivers, forests, fishing and oil and the beautiful
scenery, which still happens today. In the course
of the consultation with Scottish power I really
hope your tribes and people do not hold any ill
feeling against the Scottish people who have
suffered as much at the hands of these globalised
companies past and present who's only aim is for
profit and no consideration for their
surroundings. I speak for all Scots when I say I
hope your wishes are granted to restore your
Klamath river to, at least, a more natural state
and that we do not wish to be associated with the
problems Pacificorp and Scottish power have caused
your people.
In relation to hydro
electric power in Scotland: As far as I know all
the hydro plants have fishing ladders built in to
the dam infrastructure to allow the salmon and
other fish to return up-stream, however I don't
think they were totally trouble free, i'm not
quite sure what the situation is now.
Best wishes
Andrew
Response
from KBC to Andrew:
Andrew
Our communities
support the dams in our area. The tribes know that
if the dams are taken out , it would destroy much
of our ag community by floods, etc. The tribes and
environmental groups are against agriculture,
logging, mining, power, and any kind of economical
benefit to our country, however, they eat food,
live in log houses, and use power and minerals.
They have been successful in shutting down timber
harvest of logs that were burned up in 2002 and
are now rotting because the 'environmentalists'
want everything natural. They would rather the
forest burned down along with the 'endangered'
owls rather than have a timber company selective
'log' the forest and maybe ruin an owl tree. Owls
fly but they don't do well in wildfires.
http://www.klamathbasincrisis.org/0kbcsavogl8resns.htm
On that page, scientist David Vogel tells the
peer-reviewed decline of coho in the Klamath
River.
http://www.kwua.org/power/pdamremovalkwuapersp072704.htm
tells Klamath Water Users perspective on the dams.
The Tribes are trying
to re-obtain 690,000 acres of land that they sold
twice. They chose to sell it and voted to sell
it. The Department of Justice and Bureau of
Indian Affairs hired Dr. Hardy to create science
to go against the irrigators in the water
adjudication for water rights, favoring the
tribes. That is the 'science' they are using to
take water away from the private land owners from
the irrigation storage they built and paid for,
which essentially destroys irrigated agriculture.
All of their political activities center around
taking our land and our water and giving it to the
Tribes, again, even when the peer-reviewed science
says it is not justified.
In 2002, over 30,000
Trinity River fish died 200 miles from the Klamath
Project of a disease. That year the run of coho
was the 3rd highest recorded. So the Tribes and
Environmental groups did not test the water for a
week, then immediately blamed agriculture in the
Klamath Basin for the fish deaths, using that as
an excuse to try to shut down our family farms.
They say that ag is diverting water from the fish
and tribes, where in fact the river flows are 30%
higher than before the Klamath Project was built
according to recent Natural Flow Studies by the
Bureau of Reclamation.
No, the Tribes and
'environmental' groups are not speaking for our
communities as a whole, and their words are not
necessarily based on truth and science.
Also, regarding the power companies, when the Klamath Project was built, the power company wanted our water to make power for America. So the business transaction was, as a partner, they would have use of more water than possible without the Klamath Project, and we would be entitled to reasonable power rates. That way electricity and agriculture could both be achieved, with great benefits to our economy and food/power availability. So we irrigators and consumers of power and food look at the power companies as partners, not destroyers. Also, the power companies spend millions of dollars to help fish and our environment.
Thanks for your
letter. I hope this explains how our communities
feel about dams and fish.
KBC
|
Home
Page Updated: Thursday May 07, 2009 09:14 AM Pacific
Copyright © klamathbasincrisis.org, 2004, All Rights Reserved